SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(P&H) 35

P.C.PANDIT, D.K.MAHAJAN, S.S.DULAT
Northern India Transporters Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shrimati Amra Watti – Respondent


Judgment

Dulat, J.

1. A passenger bus belonging to the Sheikhupura Transport Company Ltd. met with an accident and two passengers were killed. Their widows and other heirs made claims for compensation before the Tribunal appointed under the Motor Vehicles Act. The bus was insured against third party risks necessary under the Motor Vehicles Act, the insurer being the Northern India Transporters Insurance Company. The Tribunal found that a sum of Rs. 8,000 was payable as compensation to one widow and Rs. 14,000 to the other, and directed under Section 96 of the Motor Vehicles Act that the whole of this compensation be recovered from the insurance company. Against that decision two appeals were filed by the insurance company and two cross-appeals by the claimants, who prayed for higher compensation. The appeals were heard in the first instance by one of us, and the main point taken on behalf of the insurance company was that the insurance concerning passengers was limited to the terms of the Motor Vehicles Act under Section 95(2) and in terms of that section the liability of the insurer was limited to Rs. 20,000 in respect of all the passengers and it was further limited in the case of











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top