PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Harbans Singh, J.
Sukh Dev Sarup Gupta
Versus
State Of Punjab
Civil Writ No. 926 of 1964,
Decided On : FEBRUARY 11, 1965
PUNJAB EXCISE ACT - SECTION 3(6)(C) - SALES TAX ACT - SCHEDULE B, ENTRY 37 - CENTRAL ACT - SECTION 21 - GENERAL CLAUSES ACT - SECTION 8 - REPEAL AND RE-ENACTMENT - EXEMPTION FROM SALES TAX - ALCOHOLIC PREPARATIONS - INTERPRETATION.
Fact of the Case:
Prior to the Constitution, alcoholic preparations were subject to excise duty under the Punjab Excise Act and exempt from sales tax under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act. After the Constitution, excise duty on alcoholic preparations became a Union subject, but the State Government continued to collect the duty. The Central Government passed the Medical and Toilet Preparation (Excise Duties) Act, which repealed the corresponding provisions of the Punjab Excise Act and provided for uniform excise duty rates. The petitioners, manufacturers of alcoholic preparations, challenged the demand for sales tax on their products after the enforcement of the Central Act.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that by virtue of Section 8 of the General Clauses Act, the reference to the Punjab Excise Act in Entry 37 of Schedule B of the Sales Tax Act must be construed as a reference to the Central Act. Therefore, the exemption from sales tax for alcoholic preparations continued to apply even after the enforcement of the Central Act.
Issues: Whether the exemption from sales tax for alcoholic preparations under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act continued to apply after the enforcement of the Central Act, which repealed the corresponding provisions of the Punjab Excise Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted Section 8 of the General Clauses Act to mean that when a Central Act repeals and re-enacts a provision of a State Act, references to the repealed provision in other enactments must be construed as references to the re-enacted provision in the Central Act. Therefore, the reference to the Punjab Excise Act in Entry 37 of Schedule B of the Sales Tax Act must be construed as a reference to the Central Act, and the exemption from sales tax for alcoholic preparations continued to apply.
Final Decision: The Court quashed the impugned orders demanding sales tax from the petitioners and held that the demand and assessment of sales tax on alcoholic preparations by the Excise Department was illegal and ultra vires.
1. The facts giving rise to this writ petition which have been very clearly brought out in the petitioners may briefly be stated as under.
2. Prior to the enforcement of the Constitution on 26th of January, 1950, under clause (c) of subs (6) of S. 3 of the Punjab Excise Act "any medicinal or toilet preparations containing alcohol fell within the definition of "excisable articles" which were subject to the excise duty under the aforesaid Act.
Subsequently, the Punjab General Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as sales Tax Act) came into force in 1948, which levied sales tax on sale of goods except articles which were excepted under S. 6 from such tax Act. Entry 37 of this Schedule was in the following terms:-
- "All goods on which duty is or may be levied under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 * *."
As stated above, inasmuch as medicinal or toilet preparations containing alcohol (hereinafter referred to as "alcoholic preparations") were subject to excise duty under the Punjab Excise Act the same were exempt form sales tax. Under the Constitution alcoholic preparation, which under the Government of India Act (which stood repealed by the Constitution) was a Provincial subject was transferred to the Union List. As a result of the enforcement of the Constitution therefore cl (c) of sub-s (6) of S. 3 stood omitted by the Adaptations of Laws Order 1950. However, Art 227. the Constitution provides as follows:-
- "Any taxes, duties, cesses or fees which immediately before the commencement of this Constitution were being lawfully levied by the Government of the State * * for the purposes of the State * * may notwithstanding that those taxes duties cesses or fees are mentioned in the Union List continue to be levied and to be applied to the same purposes until provisions to the contrary is made by Parliament by law."
As a result of this provisions therefore although excise duty on alcoholic preparations became a Union subject yet the Date Government continued to levy this excise duty even after 26th of January, 1950. In 1955 however the Parliament passed Medical and Toilet Preparation (Excise Duties) Act (hereinafter referred to as the Central Act) dealing with the subject of imposition of excise duty on those alcoholic preparations. Obviously the object of this enactment as mentioned in the object clause was to bring about a uniformity in all the States as regard the rate of imposition of excise duty on these alcoholic preparations and to have a uniform procedure and regulation regarding the export and import thereof from one State to another. Section 21 of the act provided as follows:-
- "If, immediate before the commencement of this Act there is in force in any State any law corresponding to this Act that law is hereby repealed."
The Schedule to this Central Act provided the rate to which the excise duty was to be levied on various types of alcoholic properties. Though the rate of excise duty was thus made uniform yet the definition of the "collecting Government" which was entitled to collect the excise duty included State Government and the question whether the Central Government was to collect the duty was left to the rules. It is averred in the petitioners and not denied on behalf of the State that notwithstanding the passing of the Central Act the collections of this excise duty continues to be done by the State Government authorities and the duty so collected goes to the State exchequer. Thus the effect of the Central Act was only to achieve uniformity without bringing about nay difference. It is alleged in the petitioners that although prior to be enforcement of the Central act the petitioners paid only the excised duty on the alcoholic preparations manufactured by him and he has exempted form payment of nay sales-tax the sales tax authorities after the enforcement of the Central Act began to demand and collect sales-tax the sales tax authorities after the enforcement of the Central Act began to demand and collect sales-t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.