1964 Supreme(P&H) 197
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
D.K.Mahajan, J.
Harbans Singh S.Harkishan Singh
Versus
Union Of India
Civil Writ No. 1482 of 1962,
Decided On : NOVEMBER 27, 1964
A loan incurred by a displaced person from the Industries Department Punjab is a "public dues" within the meaning of section 2(d)(ii) of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, and should be adjusted towards the compensation payable to him under the Act.
Headnote:
DISPLACED PERSONS (COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION) ACT, 1954 - SECTION 2(D)(II) - RULES 14 AND 15 - LOAN INCURRED BY DISPLACED PERSON FROM INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT PUNJAB - ADJUSTMENT TOWARDS COMPENSATION PAYABLE UNDER THE ACT - HELD, LOAN WAS A "PUBLIC DUES" AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED WHEN THE FINAL CERTIFICATE AS TO COMPENSATION WAS GIVEN TO THE PETITIONER.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner, a displaced person, incurred a loan of Rs. 25,000/- from the Industries Department Punjab on 7th May 1957. On 20th August 1960, the Department issued a notice demanding payment of installments due, threatening to recover the entire loan amount in case of default. Petitioner approached the Department requesting adjustment of Rs. 25,419.70 due to him as compensation from the Central Government under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954. The Punjab Government advised him to approach the Central Government, which refused the request. Hence, the present petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the loan incurred by the petitioner was a "public dues" within the meaning of section 2(d)(ii) of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, and should have been adjusted towards the compensation payable to him under the Act. The court further held that the Central Government was in error in not acceding to the petitioner's request for adjustment.
Issues: Whether the loan incurred by the petitioner was a "public dues" within the meaning of section 2(d)(ii) of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted section 2(d)(ii) of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, and held that the loan incurred by the petitioner was a "public dues" as it was recoverable from him by the Industries Department Punjab. The court also relied on Rules 14 and 15 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955, which provide for the deduction of "public dues" from the amount of compensation payable to a displaced person.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed the Central Government to adjust the loan towards the petitioner's claim. The court also directed that if the petitioner had paid anything towards the loan, he would be afforded credit to that extent.
1. In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India there is no dispute as to facts. The petitioner is displaced person. He had left property in West Punjab and in lieu thereof was entitled to compensation under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act. On the 7th of May, 1957, he incurred a loan of Rs. 25,000/- from the Industries Department Punjab. On the 20th of August, 1960, the Department issued a notice to the petitioner (copy Annexure B) demanding payment of the installments due. In case of default the department would proceed to recover the entire amount of the loan. The petitioner approached the Department with a request that a sum of RS. 25,419.70 was due to him as compensation from the Central Government under the Act and this amount be adjusted and whatever balance still remained due the petitioner would pay. The Punjab Government took the position that it was not concerned with this matter of adjustment and the petitioner was advised to approach the Central Government the Central Government which refused the petitioners request. Hence the present petition.
2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that under the Act and the Rules framed thereunder the compensation has to be adjusted towards the loan due from the petitioners the loan being a "public dues." In section 2(d) of the Act "public dues" has been defined as under:-
-
"public dues in relation to a displaced person includes-- (i)arrears of rent in respect of any properly allotted or leased to the displaced person by the Central Government or a State Government or the Custodian;
(ii)any amount recoverable whether in one lump sum or in installments from the displaced person account of loans granted to him by the Central Government or a State Government or the Rehabilitation Finance Administration constituted under the Rehabilitation Finance administration Act, 1948, (XII of 1948) and any interest on such loans;
(iii) the amount of purchase money or any part thereof and any interest on such amount or part remaining unpaid and recoverable from the displaced person on account of transfer to him of any property or interest therein by-- (a) the Central Government or
(b) any State Government; or
(c) any body corporate or other authority or person financed by the Central Government or a State Government and such dues have been declared by the Central Government by have been declared by the Central Government by notification in the Official Gazette to be public dues recoverable from the displaced person."
The Rules under which the petitioner claims the adjustments are Rules 14 and 15 and these Rules are in these terms-- "14. Deduction of certain dues from the amount of compensation--The following dues shall be deducted from the amount of compensation in the order of priority mentioned below: (i)public dues;
(ii) the amount if any referred to in clause (a) of Rule 13.
(iii) the amount if any referred to in clause (b) of Rule 13.
15. Determination of net compensation--After deducting the amount referred to in Rule 14 m the Regional Settlement Commissioner or a Settlement Officer. or an Assistant Settlement Officer having jurisdiction and duly authorised by the Regional Settlement Commissioner shall pass an order determination the net amount of compensation payable to the applicant in respect of his verified claim and shall prepare a summary in the form specified in Appendix VII (abstract of particulars)."
3. It appears from the combined reading of these provisions that the contention of the petition that he is entitled tot he adjustment of his claim amounting to Rs. 25, 419. 70 towards the loan is correct. Rule 14 makes it incumbent on the Government before determining the net amount of compensation to deduct "public dues" due form the claimant, The deduct "public dues" due from the claimant. The short question that arises for determination therefore is whether the loan of Rs. 25,000/- was a "public