SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(P&H) 75

A.N.GROVER, GURDEV SINGH
Mansa Ram Sushil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Assessing Authority – Respondent


Judgment

A.N.Grover, J.

1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution by which the order dated 22nd January, 1963, of assessment of sales tax for two quarters ending 30th June, 1962, and 30th September, 1962, have been challenged.

2. The petitioner is the sole proprietor of a firm known as Mansa Ram Sushil Kumar and is engaged in the business of selling oil at Ludhiana. This firm is registered under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter called the Act), and also under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 . It appears that the petitioner-firm has to file quarterly returns and for the two quarters ending 30th June, 1962, and 30th September, 1962, it filed the returns and paid the amount of tax in accordance with the returns which were filed as required Under Section 10 of the Act. On 11th December, 1962, the respondent issued a statutory notice Under Section 11 in Form S.T. XIV. The petitioner appeared before the respondent on 31st December, 1962, and produced the declaration form as required under the Act in Form S.T. XXII. By the impugned order the respondent did not accept the contention of the petitioner that sales had been made to registered dealer










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top