SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(P&H) 92

Roshan Lal Kuthiala – Appellant
Versus
Income-tax Officer, Special Investigation Circle, Ambala – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is a petition under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution filed by Roshan Lal Kuthiala challenging the legality of a notice dated January 30, 1963, issued by the Income-tax Officer for the payment of advance tax under the provisions of section 210 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

2. According to the allegations of the petitioner, on December 31, 1962, the Income-tax Officer, Special Investigation Circle, Ambala, respondent, had passed an assessment order for the year 1958-59 purporting to be under section 23 (3)/34 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and had issued a demand notice for the payment of Rs. 2,66,794.32 nP. on an income of about Rs. 3,13,630. On January 30, 1963, the said Income-tax Officer issued a notice for the payment of advance tax under section 210 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, requiring the petitioner to pay by March 1, 1963, a sum of Rs. 2,32,081 determined to be payable for the financial year 1962-63 on the basis of the assessment order dated December 31, 1962. Since this notice was illegal, the petitioner made representations to the Income-tax Officer and the Commissioner of Income-tax, but without any result. This led to the filing of the presen























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top