SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(P&H) 97

S.S.DULAT, P.C.PANDIT
National Rayon Corporation Ltd. , Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Additional Assistant Excise And Taxation Commissioner, Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Dulat, J.

1. These three appeals under clause 10 of the Letters Patent (Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 263, 264 and 265 of 1963 ). arise out of a single judgment of Shamsher Bahadur, J., by which he dismissed three writ petitions brought on behalf of the appellant under Art. 226 of the Conditional Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner in respect of levy of sales-tax under the central Tax Act, 1956.

2. The appellant is a company with its registered office in Bombay ant, at the time, it has a branch office at Amritsar which is managed by Kishan Chand and Company. The company is engaged in the manufacture of rayon yarn in its factory at, Bombay and some of it is sent to Amritsar to its Branch office for distribution and sale. The company is a registered dealer both under the East Punjab General Sales Act. 1948, and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 . In respect of three consecutive years--1957-58, 1958-59 and 1959-60--the company filed its returns and the Assessing Authority made its decision on the 19th February 1959. For the next year, 1958-59, the decision was made on the 14th of July 1959 and for the following year, 1959-60, it was made on the 7th of October 1960. The appe











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top