SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(P&H) 101

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
I.D.Dua and D.K.Mahajan JJ.
Surinder Nath Khosla
Versus
Excise And Taxation Commissioner
Civil Writ No. 2285 of 1963,
Decided On : JULY 22, 1964

The managing director of a limited company cannot be arrested for the realization of arrears of sales tax due by the company.

Headnote:

SALES TAX - ARREST OF MANAGING DIRECTOR - LIABILITY OF MANAGING DIRECTOR FOR ARREARS OF SALES TAX DUE BY LIMITED COMPANY - PUNJAB GENERAL SALES TAX ACT (NO. 2 OF 1963), SECTION 6 - PUNJAB GENERAL SALES TAX RULES, RULE 40(1).

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, the managing director of a limited company, was arrested for the realization of arrears of sales tax due by the company. The petitioner challenged the arrest, contending that he could not be arrested for the company's tax liability.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the petitioner could not be arrested for the company's tax liability. The court reasoned that a limited company is a separate legal entity from its shareholders and that the managing director is not personally liable for the company's debts or liabilities.

Issues: Whether the managing director of a limited company can be arrested for the realization of arrears of sales tax due by the company.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the following legal principles in reaching its decision: * A limited company is a separate legal entity from its shareholders. * The managing director of a limited company is not personally liable for the company's debts or liabilities. * The provisions of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act and Rules do not authorize the arrest of the managing director of a limited company for the realization of arrears of sales tax due by the company.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed that the warrants for the petitioner's arrest be cancelled.

Judgment

1. This writ petition was admitted to a Division Bench, on account of its importance at the time of admission, on 13th December, 1963. It was specifically ordered that it should be set down for hearing on 18th December, 1963, but in spite of this order it appears that the return was filed as late as February, 1964, though the affidavit purports to have been sworn in December, 1963.

2. The only question which this petition raises is whether the managing director of a limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act can be arrested for the realisation of arrears of sales tax due by the limited company. The limited company in the present case is the New Age Publication Limited, Patiala, and Shri Surinder Nath Khosla, Advocate, its managing director.

3. In the return, the grounds on which the impugned action has been sought to be justified is that the petitioner had himself been actually carrying on the business in his personal capacity under the guise of Messrs New Age Publication Limited, Patiala. A further plea sought to be raised is that the petitioner was himself a dealer liable to pay the tax because he had himself been carrying on the business ; this liability was sought to be supported under Rule 40(1) of the Rules framed under the East Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 .

4. In my opinion, the respondents contention is wholly unsustainable and the petitioner can by no means be arrested in connection with the realisation of the arrears of sales tax due from the New Age Publication Limited.

5. In In re Desiraju Venkatakrishna Sarma [1954] 5 S.T.C. 448, a learned single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court observed that the directors of a limited liability company cannot be made personally liable for the arrears of sales tax due by the company. In such a case the taxing authorities can only proceed against the assets of the company. In support of this view, reference in the reported case was made to Public Prosecutor V/s. Jacob Nadar [1951] 2 S.T.C. 53 and In re Behara Lachanna Patnaick [1952] 3 S.T.C. 222. In the course of the judgment, it was observed that the company which is a body corporate can be made liable for the payment of taxes and in respect of taxes payable by it the individuals constituting the company cannot be held responsible for the default in payment of such taxes. I am inclined, as at present advised, to agree with the enunciation of law in the reported case. In L. Parmeshwari Das V/s. The Collector of Bulandshahr [1955] 6 S.T.C. 399, a learned single Judge of the Allahabad High Court also observed that a limited company, incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, is an entity separate and distinct from its shareholders. The shareholders have no interest in the assets of the company and are not personally liable for its debts or liabilities. Where sales tax has been assessed on the company, proceedings for its recovery can only be taken against the assets of the company and any proceedings taken against the shareholders or their personal assets are void and against law.

6. Reference to Section 6 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act (No. 2 of 1963) made by the respondents learned counsel appears to me to be wholly irrelevant because it merely provides for cases where a dealer is an undivided Hindu family, firm or other association of persons which has been partitioned, dissolved or disrupted. Obviously, it can have no reference to a company registered under the Indian Companies Act. An incorporated company, as is well-known, is a juristic person, a separate entity distinct from any individual shareholder and the business carried on by the company belongs to it in its juristic capacity, and not to its shareholders. A partnership unlike the company is merely an association of persons for carrying on the business of partnership, and in law the firm name is a compendious method of describing the partners. Rule 40 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Rules to which faint reference has been made p


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top