SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(P&H) 101

I.D.DUA, D.K.MAHAJAN
Surinder Nath Khosla – Appellant
Versus
Excise And Taxation Commissioner – Respondent


Judgment

1. This writ petition was admitted to a Division Bench, on account of its importance at the time of admission, on 13th December, 1963. It was specifically ordered that it should be set down for hearing on 18th December, 1963, but in spite of this order it appears that the return was filed as late as February, 1964, though the affidavit purports to have been sworn in December, 1963.

2. The only question which this petition raises is whether the managing director of a limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act can be arrested for the realisation of arrears of sales tax due by the limited company. The limited company in the present case is the New Age Publication Limited, Patiala, and Shri Surinder Nath Khosla, Advocate, its managing director.

3. In the return, the grounds on which the impugned action has been sought to be justified is that the petitioner had himself been actually carrying on the business in his personal capacity under the guise of Messrs New Age Publication Limited, Patiala. A further plea sought to be raised is that the petitioner was himself a dealer liable to pay the tax because he had himself been carrying on the business ; this liability w





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top