P.D.SHARMA, R.P.KHOSLA
Mela Singh Sohan Mal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
P.D.Sharma, J.
1. Ram Parkash Food Inspector, Municipal Committee, Amritsar, on 13th September. 1961, purchased a sample of mixed milk buffalo and cow according to rules from Mela Singh accused-petitioner and sent the same to the Public Analyst for analysis. The Public Analyst in his report dated 14th September 1961, certified that the said sample contained milk fat 5.2 per cent and milk solids not fat 8.2 per cent instead of 8.5 per cent and so in his opinion the sample was adulterated with water to an extent of about 3 per cent. The Food Inspector on the basis of this report lodged a complaint under Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and also mentioned therein that the accused had previously been convicted under the same provision of law and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 300.00 or in default to undergo simple imprisonment for four months.
This came up for hearing before Shri Gian Singh Chambial, Magistrate First Class, Amritsar. The accused before him contended that he sold cow milk and not mixed milk of cow and buffalo. The learned Magistrate however, found the complaint as correct and, consequently, convict
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.