SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(P&H) 174

D.FALSHAW, GROVER
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Shri Makhan Lal Etc. – Respondent


Judgment

D.Falshaw, J.

1. This is an appeal filed by the State under clause 10 of the Letters Patent against the order of Mehar Singh, J. accepting a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by two brothers Makhan Lal and Sis Ram and quashing an order passed by the Director, Consolidation of Holdings exercising the powers of the Government under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act of 1948, dated the 15th of September, 1958.

2. The facts are that consolidation had taken place in Jamalpur, the village of the petitioner and the three non-official respondents in the writ petition, and the final scheme was published and repartition carried out during 1950. Nearly two years later in May, 1958 Onkar Singh, Chandu Lal and Sajjan Singh respondents presented an application to the Minister for the provision of a path through a part of the land of the petitioners to enable them to take a tractor and trailer to their own land by short direct route, it being necessary for them otherwise to take their tractor and trailer by one or other of two roundabout routes which were interrupted by a number of bunds. It was urged that this wou












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top