SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(P&H) 178

BAL RAJ TULI, HARBANS SINGH
Suresh Chandra Marwaha – Appellant
Versus
Lauls Private Ltd. And Ors. – Respondent


Judgment

1. The appellant, Suresh Chandra Marwaha, filed a petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act against the respondents which was dismissed by the learned single judge on March 17, 1972, and this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent has been directed against that order.

2. The appellant is a shareholder of M/s. Lauls Private Ltd., Faridabad (hereinafter called " the company "), holding 5 shares of Rs. 100 each. His mother, Shrimati Shiv Chandrika Marwaha, holds 754 shares and the petition has been filed with her support. Thus, the appellant and his mother hold more than 10 per cent. shares of the company and were entitled to file a petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act.

3. The company was incorporated as a private company limited by shares in 1933 and its principal promoter was Shri S. R. Laul, advocate. Articles 6 and 8 of the company provided as under :

"6. That no shares of this company shall be held by any person other than the descendants of Mr. S. R. Laul except such shares as have been or are transferred with the previous consent of the board of directors as laid down in Article 6 or are allotted to any outsider hereafter by the











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top