SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(P&H) 122

RAJENDRA NATH MITTAL
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Rani Rai Bajaj – Respondent


Judgment

1. These five appeals will be disposed of by this judgment which have been numbered as F.A.O. Nos. 41, 42, 44, 96 of 1966 and 173 of 1967. All the appeals arise out of one judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) which was passed in five claim petitions, details of which are given here under. I have also given the number of appeals against each claim in which it has been filed:-

- Sr. No. ___________________ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Claim application No. ___________________ 15/CT of 1964 19/CT of 1964 20/CT of 1964 21/CT of 1964 22/CT of 1964 Name of the Parties __________________ Rani Bai Bajaj and others. V/s. Darshan Singh and others. Dewan Manmohan Lal V/s. Darshan Singh and others Pritam Singh V/s. Darshan Singh and others. Mathura Dass V/s. Darshan Singh and others. Shrimathi Bhagwanti and others V/s. Darshan Singh and others Appeal, if field with number and the name of the appellant ___________________

(i) Appeal filed by Rani Bai Bajaj for enhancement of compensation F.A.O.No.96 of 1966.

(ii) Appeal filed by National Insurance Company Ltd., F.A.O.No.41 of 1966. No appeal filed. No appeal filed.

(i) Appeal filed by Mathura Dass f






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top