SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(P&H) 61

D.K.MAHAJAN, P.S.PATTAR
Amar Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

D.K.Mahajan, J.

1. This appeal under clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the decision of a learned Single Judge of this Court and the only point that has been debated before us relates to the grant of future interest.

2. Messrs Suraj Ram and Sons (hereinafter referred to as the firm) consisted of two partners, Prehlad Kumar and Amar Kumar, entered into an agreement with Kot Kapura Cooperative Marketing Society, Kot Kapura (hereinafter referred to as the Society) for making purchases from the said Society. It was also agreed that if there was any dispute it was to be referred to an arbitrator to be appointed by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies. Later on, disputes arose between the firm and the Society and they were referred to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies. The Registrar entrusted the dispute to an arbitrator under section 56 of the Co-operative Societies Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The arbitrator gave his award on July 15, 1966. An appeal was taken against his award, but was dismissed as barred by time. A revision against the award also failed. The firm then preferred a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top