SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(P&H) 63

D.K.MAHAJAN, C.G.SURI
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Vidya Sagar – Respondent


Judgment

D.K.Mahajan, J.

1. This order will dispose of Income-tax Cases Nos. 26, 27 and 28 of 1972.

2. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala, has moved this court under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, praying that in Income-tax Cases Nos. 26 and 27 of 1972, the following question of law should be referred for the opinion of this court;

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in reducing the quantum of penalty having been satisfied that the offence of concealment was there without any doubt ?"

3. In Income-tax Case No. 28 of 1972, the Commissioner wants the following two questions of law to be referred for the opinion of this court:

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified to hold that the assessee had a reasonable cause for late filing of return in March, 1968 ?

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified to hold that there was a delay of one month only till February, 1964, when actually under Section 139(1) the delay was from October 1, 1963, to February 18, 1964, for four months?"

4. The facts of





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top