SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(P&H) 178

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
D.K.Mahajan and Pritam Singh Pattar JJ.
Ambala Bus Syndicate Private Ltd.
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax
Income tax Reference No. 13 of 1973,
Decided On : NOVEMBER 21, 1973

Contributions made to political parties to prevent nationalisation of business are allowable deductions under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, if they are incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of saving the business from annihilation.

Headnote:

INCOME TAX - Deductions - Political contributions - Whether allowable under Section 37 - Contributions made to political parties through Punjab Motor Union to prevent nationalisation of transport business - Held, allowable.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a transport company, made contributions to political parties through the Punjab Motor Union to prevent the nationalisation of the transport business. The Income-tax Officer, Appellate Assistant Commissioner, and Income-tax Appellate Tribunal disallowed the claim for deduction of these contributions under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the contributions were allowable deductions under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found that there was a clear connection between the contributions and the business of the assessee because it got over the notification that was issued on 19th November, 1969, which threatened to nationalise the transport business. The court also found that the money was spent to get over the notification, particularly when no other fact has been brought on the record to show that something else intervened to make the Government change its decision.

Issues: Whether the contributions made by the assessee to political parties through the Punjab Motor Union were allowable deductions under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the contributions were allowable deductions under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because they were incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of saving the business from annihilation. The court relied on the decision of the Delhi High Court in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, [1972] 85 I.T.R. 261, 266, 270 (Delhi).

Final Decision: The court answered the question referred to it in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.

Judgment

1. This order will dispose of Income-tax References Nos. 13and 14 of 1973. They pertain to the assessment years 1969-70 and 1970-71, respectively. The question which is referred for our opinion is the same and may now be stated:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the contributions by the assessee to the political parties through the Punjab Motor Union, Chandigarh, were allowable under Section 37 ?"

2. It will appear from the frame of the question that it is admitted that there were contributions by the assessee to the political parties through the Punjab Motor Union, Chandigarh, and the only question is whether they were allowable deductions.

3. The assessee is a transport company. Its route permits were to expire on June 30, 1969. There was a threat of complete nationalisation of the transport business and in this connection reference may be made to the Notification No. 12748-IHT-69, dated 19th November, 1969, Transport Department, published in the Punjab Gazette (Extraordinary), dated November 19, 1969. The relevant clauses of the notification are 2, 3, 4 and 6 arid are quoted below :

"2. (a) All further operations on the existing local routes not exceeding twelve miles in length in the Punjab territories as well as on monoply routes, namely, Jullundur-Amritsar and Ferozepore-Fazilka, shall be undertaken exclusively by the Punjab Roadways.

(b) Sixty percent, of the operations on the new local routes not exceeding ten miles in length in the Punjab territories shall be undertaken by the Punjab Roadways and the remaining forty per cent. by the existing private operators and new entrants in the ratio of thirty to ten, respectively.

3. Sixty per cent. of the overall operations that are being undertaken on or immediately before 30th June, 1959, on the routes specified in annexure A shall be undertaken by the Punjab Roadways.

4. All operations on new routes or on account of increase in traffic on the existing routes specified in annexure A shall be undertaken as under : (i) Sixty per cent. ot the operations :-

- (a) on existing and new intra-State routes ;

(b) on such routes as were intra-State immediately before the appointed day but have become inter-State on the appointee day as a result of the reorganisation of the State of Punjab ;

and

(c) accruing to the Punjab territories on inter-regional routes ; shall be undertaken by the Punjab Roadways.

(ii) Further operations on inter-State routes (whether existing or new) other than those specified in (i)(b) above, shall be undertaken by the Punjab Roadways exclusively.

6. The provisions of this scheme shall have effect for a period of seven years from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette, whereafter one-third of the operations of the private operators shall be taken over by the Punjab Roadways each year."

4. In the face of this, the transporters formed a common forum to prevent nationalisation. This forum was styled as the Punjab Motor Union. According to the assessee, all the transporters contributed funds to that forum and that forum donated the money so collected to different political parties. It is stated by the assessee that these parties exercised their weight with the Government and ultimately the total nationalisation was prevented. The assessee got an extension of seven years for its route permits. The assessee had paid a sum of Rs. 10,000 to the Punjab Motor Union and it claimed it as revenue expenditure. This claim was not allowed by the Income-tax Officer and by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner on appeal. Even the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal rejected the assessees claim in a further appeal. The Tribunal, while dealing with this matter, observed as follows:

"We have given our careful thought to the contentions of both the sides and we are of the view that the assessee has no case. The assessee does not know the details of the donations to the political parties. He only gave the amounts to the Punja










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top