SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(P&H) 140

D.K.MAHAJAN, C.G.SURI
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Brij Bhushan Lal, Ramesh Kumar – Respondent


Judgment

D.K.Mahajan, J.

1. This order will cover Income-tax References Nos. 2 and 3 of 1973. In these references a single question of law has been referred for our opinion, namely:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the cost of material supplied by the Government was not to be included while estimating the profit of a contractor ?"

2. The assessee is a registered firm. It derives its income from contract business. The assessment years in question are 1965-66 and 1966-67, accounting years ending on 31st March, 1965, and 31st March, 1966, respectively. The assessee filed its return of income declaring the income at Rs. 18,684 for the assessment year 1965-66. The total receipts from the contract were Rs. 2,63,853. The income was shown on the basis of account maintained but during the assessment proceedings, the assessee offered that a that rate of 9 per cent, on the total receipt of Rs. 2,63,853 be applied. The Income-tax Officer, however, applied a flat rate of 10 per cent, on total receipt of Rs. 3,07,605. The total receipt shown by the assessnc at Rs. 2,63,853 did not include the value of the stores supplied by th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top