HARBANS SINGH, PREM CHAND JAIN
Controller Of Estate Duty – Appellant
Versus
Ved Parkash Jain – Respondent
1. This reference under Section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as " the Act "), has been made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, on the application filed by the Controller of Estate Duty, requesting the Appellate Tribunal to refer to this court a question of law which is said to have arisen out of the Tribunals order in EDA No. 2 of 1969-70. The Tribunal has referred the following question of law for our opinion :
" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the share of goodwill of a deceased partner in the assets of a firm passes on his death under the Estate Duty Act ?"
2. The facts of the case are as follows:
3. One Hari Ram was partner in the firms of Messrs. Hari Ram Kishori Lal and Messrs. Ved Parkash Vijay Kumar. He died on 26th April, 1966. The Assistant Controller of Estate Duty made an addition of Rs. 17,251 in the principal value of his estate representing his share of goodwill in the said two firms, in the following manner :
M/s. Hari Ram Kishori Lal Rs.8,134
M/s. Ved Parkash Vijay Kumar Rs.8,917
4. On appeal, the Zonal Appellate Controller of Estate Duty excluded the share of Rs. 8/134 in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.