BAL RAJ TULI
Resham Lal – Appellant
Versus
Anand Sarup – Respondent
, J.
1. This is a petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order of the Subordinate Judge, Ist Class, Jagraon, refusing to try the following issue as a preliminary issue:-
-
"Whether the suit is properly valued for the purposes of court-fee and jurisdiction ?"
The other issues in the case are:--
1. Whether the plaintiff is the owner of the property in dispute?
2. Whether Messrs. Bhana Mal Brij Lal is a necessary party, being tenants in the property in dispute?
3. Whether the plaintiff is estopped from suing by his acts and conduct?
4. Whether Brij Lal, father of defendants 1 to 6 was a statutory tenant of defendant 7 ? If so, its effect?
5. To what amount the plaintiff is entitled on account of mesne profits from defendants 1 to 6?
6. Relief.
2. The suit was for the possession of shop and its mesne profits. The value for purposes of court-fee was fixed at Rs. 2000/- for possession of the shop and Rs. 3000/- tentatively for the relief with regard to mesne profits. An objection was raised by the defendants-petitioners that the suit had not been properly valued for the purposes of court-fee and jurisdiction, which led to the framing of the prelimin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.