HARBANS SINGH, BAL RAJ TULI
Assessing Authority – Appellant
Versus
Amir Chand Om Parkash – Respondent
Harbans Singh, J.
1. This order will dispose of three appeals under clause 10 of the Letters Patent (L.P.A. Nos. 12, 13 and 126 of 1973) and General Sales Tax Reference No. 12 of 1972, which all raise a common question of law. The three appeals relate to Punjab whereas the business is carried on by the assessee in the sales tax reference at Ambala Cantonment in Haryana, but, for the purpose of the decision of the law point, there is hardly any difference between the law as applicable to the two States.
2. Section 5 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is the taxing section. Sub-section (1) of this section is to the following effect: Subject to the provisions of this Act, there shall be levied on the taxable turnover of a dealer a tax at such rates, not exceeding seven paise in a rupee as the State Government may by notification direct:
Provided that a tax at such rate, not exceeding ten paise in a rupee, as may be so notified, may be levied on the sale of luxury goods as specified in Schedule A appended to this Act from such date as the State Government may by notification direct. The State Government after giving by notification n
Commissioner Of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh, Nagpur V/s. Mohanlal Ramkisan Nathani, Raipur
Haji Jamaluddin Manguji V/s. State
State Of Bombay V/s. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha
Science House V/s. The Assessing Authority, Ludhiana
Messrs. Amir Chand Om Parkash V/s. Assessing Authority
Sales Tax, U.P. V/s. Indian Herbs Research And Supply Co.
Tribuwandas Gulabchand And Brothers, Nagpur V/s. State Of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.