SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(P&H) 46

P.C.PANDIT, BHOPINDER SINGH DHILLON
Jagan Nath Pyare Lal – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Respondent


Judgment

Bhopinder Singh Dhillon, J.

1. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to this reference are that this assessee-firm known as Messrs. Jagan Nath Pyare Lal of Ludhiana had ten partners who were members of the two families and came into existence under the instrument of partnership executed on March 27, 1952. Padam Kumar was a minor in the said partnership. When he attained majority on October 1, 1956, he opted to continue as a full-fledged partner and a fresh instrument of partnership, copy of which is annexure "A" with the statement of the case, was executed, on Octobers, 1956, by 11 partners including Shri Rabinder Kumar, having Re. 1/2 share. On April 1, 1959, the partners decided to effect a change in the profits and losses-sharing ratio. A fresh deed, copy of which is annexure "B" with the statement of the case, was executed to that effect on April 1, 1959, and, consequently, an application dated September 2, 1959, for registration of the said firm under Section 26A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, was filed on September 30, 1959, before the Income-tax Officer, A-Ward, Ludhiana, copy of which is annexure "C" with the statement of the case. Shri Rabinder Kumar, a partner





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top