SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(P&H) 120

D.V.SEHGAL
Shrimati Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Parshad – Respondent


Judgment

D.V.Sehgal, J.

1. This revision Petition under section 15(5) or the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter called the Act) is directed against the judgment dated 10-3-1978 of the learned Appellate Authority, Ferozepore, affirming the order dated 17-11-1976 of the learned Rent Controller, Ferozepore whereby an application filed by the landlord-Petitioners under section 13 of the Act for the ejectment of Jagdish Pershad and Bal Krishan respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively, from shop No. 260, situated in bazar No. 4, Ferozepore Cantt. was dismissed.

2. The facts in brief are that the shop in dispute was owned by Smt. Gian Devi, grand-mother of Tula Ram. Ram, Gopal, Sant Lal and Basant Lal landlord-petitioners, Jagdish Pershad respondent No. 1, and mother-in-law of Smt. Shanti Devi, widow of Tapeshri Ram. who is petitioner No. 1 in the present petition. It is not disputed that on the death of Smt. Gian Devi, all the aforesaid persons, including Jagdish Parshad, inherited the shop in dispute. The case of the landlord-petitioners, however, is that Jagdish Parshad was separated from the family in the year 1965, and a writing Mark `A in this regard was executed o








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top