BHOPINDER SINGH DHILLON
Shrimati Manjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Singh – Respondent
Bhopinder Singh Dhillon, J.
1. Petitioner landlady sought the ejectment of the respondent tenant. The Rent Controller dismissed her application vide order dated 27th of May, 1972. Appeal filed by her was also dismissed by the Appellate Authority on 1st September, 1973. In this revision petition the orders of the Rent Controller and that of the Appellate Authority are sought to be impugned. The only ground pressed before the Appellate Authority in appeal was that the tender of the rent was short by few naya paisa as the tenant had failed to tender the interest on a sum of Rs. 4.05 paise which amount payable as house-tax. The learned Appellate Authority came to the conclusion that there was no evidence on the record to show that the landlady had paid the house-tax earlier and that she as entitled to interest on the amount of house-tax. He further came to the conclusion in view of this no interest of Rs. 3.05 paise could be claimed by the landlady. I have no reason to differ from this finding. Neither it could be shown to me by the learned counsel for the petitioner that she was entitled to the interest on the amount of Rs. 4.05 paise as a matter of law, nor there is any evide
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.