SURINDER SINGH, HARBANS LAL, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, S.S.SIDHU, AJIT SINGH
Megha Singh And Co. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
O.CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.
1. These cases noise common questions and may be disposed of by one judgment. The petitioners are licencees, having the right to vend country liquor, under the Punjab Excise Act and the Punjab Excise Rules. They object to the imposition of tax on the sale of country liquor by various Panchayat Samitis in the State of Punjab. They question the demands made on them for payment of the tax.
2. The principal submission of Shri H. L. Sibal, learned counsel for the petitioners, was that the notifications issued by the Government of Punjab under S. 67 (5) of the Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act notifying the imposition of tax on the sale of country liquor by Panchayat Samitis were contrary to the express provisions of S. 6 read with Entry 37 of Schedule B of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act and the legislative policy underlying them. Shri Sibal urged that there was a legislative injunction, in S.6, that no tax shall be payable on the sale of goods specified in the first column of Sch. B, and since country liquor fell within Entry 37 of Sch. B; the notifications imposing tax, on the sale of country liquor were in clear violation of the legislativ
Cantonment Board V/s. Western India Theatres
Krishan V/s. R. T. O., Chittoor
Kamta Prasad Aggarwal V/s. The Executive Officer, Ballabgarh
Madhava Rao V/s. State Of Andhra Pradesh
Western India Theatres V/s. Municipal Corporation Of Poona
Western Indian Theatres V/s. Cantonment Board
Narendra Kumar V/s. Union Of India
Jan Mohammed V/s. State Of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.