SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(P&H) 127

GURNAM SINGH, M.R.SHARMA, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
State – Appellant
Versus
Prem Nath – Respondent


Judgment

O.CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.

1. Smt. Parsini Devi, who was a partner having 40 per cent share in the firm of M/s. Metal Fabriks (India) Ludhiana, died on 19-8-1969. In computing the principal value of the estate of late Parsini Devi, the Assistant Controller of Estate Duty included a sum of Rs. 93,480/- on account of the share of the deceased in the goodwill of the firm M/s. Metal Fabriks (India) Ludhiana. The Zonal Appellate Controller confirmed the order of the Assistant Controller, but the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, following a judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Controller of Estate Duty V/s. Ved Parkash Jain, 1974 0 TaxLR(P&H) 339 held that the share of goodwill of a deceased person in the assets of a firm did not pass on his death and, therefore, it could not be taken into account in computing the principal value of the estate of the deceased. The addition of Rs. 93,480 was, therefore, deleted. The Tribunal did not go into the question, whether the share of goodwill was correctly valued at Rs. 93,480. At the instance of the Revenue, the following question has been referred to us for our decision:-

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top