SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(P&H) 135

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Commissioner Of Income-tax, Patiala – Appellant
Versus
Patiala Flour Mills Co. (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment

O.CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.

1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh, has referred the following question for our decision :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in allowing the deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?"

2. The assessee, a private limited company, carried on several businesses, amongst which is a cold storage business, a new industrial undertaking within the meaning of section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was put up in the accounting year corresponding to the assessment year 1967-68. The company did not make any profit in the cold storage business though it did in its other businesses. The losses, the unabsorbed depreciation and the unabsorbed development rebate attributable to the cold storage business during the assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70 were adjusted against the profits of the other businesses while computing the total income of the assessee for those years. There was no loss, depreciation or development rebate, which had remained unadjusted and which was available for adjustment during the assessment year 1970-71. For the assessment year 1970-71,


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top