O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, S.P.GOYAL
Cineramas – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Respondent
O.Chinnappa Reddy, J.
1. The assessee who carries on business in exhibition of films is a member of the East Punjab Motion Pictures Association. Under the bye-laws of the association, a member is obliged to carry out the "award and directives" of the association arising out of all disputes between members or upon complaints received by the association. A member failing to carry out the directive of the association would be suspended from membership of the association and would be eligible to be reinstated on payment of a specified sum of penalty in addition to " reinstatement circulation charges ". The assessee had to pay a sum of Rs. 4,300 by way of penalty to the association during the accounting year relevant to the assessment year 1970-71. The assessee claimed that the sum of Rs. 4,300 paid by way of penalty to the association was a sum " laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the assessees business " and was, therefore, allowable expenditure under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that breaches of contractual obligations were not incidents of business and, therefore, the amount paid by the assessee as penalty was not allowable expen
Commissioner Of Income-tax V/s. Birla Cotton Spinning And Weaving Mills Ltd.
Commissioner Of Income-tax V/s. Malayalam Plantations Ltd.
Commissioner Of Income-tax V/s. Royal Calcutta Turf Club
Haji Aziz & Abdul Shakoor Brothers V/s. Commissioner Of Income-tax
Travancore Titamium Products Ltd. V/s. Commissioner Of Income-tax
Commissioner Of Income-tax V/s. Himalaya Rosin-turpentine Manufacturing Co.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.