SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(P&H) 89

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, BHOPINDER SINGH DHILLON, SURINDER SINGH
Arjun Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

SURINDER SINGH, J.

1. The sequence in the oft-treaded path is facts understanding...... judgment. Let us face the facts. The petitioner, Arjun Singh Negi, says in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, that he was recruited as a Lower Division Clerk in the office of the Director, Census Operations, Haryana, Chandigarh on April 14, 1969. He was promoted as an Upper Division Clerk, first on ad hoc basis on September 3, 1970 and thereafter on regular basis on October 31, 1972. The post next higher in rank is that of Accountant. A regular Upper Division Clerk having three years of service to his credit, is eligible for promotion to the post of Accountant. I. C. Sethia (the third respondent) was recruited directly in the same office as an Upper Division Clerk in the year 1970. Having joined as such earlier to the petitioner, the third respondent was admittedly senior to him. On July 25, 1972, an order was passed by which the third respondent who was working as an Assistant Accountant, was posted as a Cashier, while the petitioner who was at that time working as a Cashier, was asked to work as an Assistant Accountant. It is not disputed that both the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top