SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(P&H) 40

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, PREM CHAND JAIN, MAN MOHAN SINGH GUJRAL
Daulat Ram Trilok Nath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.

1. Whether a writ of mandamus can or should issue for a claim of money simpliciter- is the significant issue which arises at the very threshold of this case admitted directly to a hearing by a Full Bench.

2. The facts are not in serious dispute. Thirty-one partnership business firms of Tarn Taran, district Amritsar, have jointly moved this writ petition to claim a writ of mandamus for the refund of unspecified sums of money which are alleged to have been paid by them under a mistake of fact or law to the Market Committee, Tarn Taran. It is the common case that under the earlier unamended Sec. 23 of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act (hereinafter called the Act) the Market Committees were entitled to levy fee ad valorem at the rate of Rs. 1.50 P. on the purchase or sale of agricultural produce worth Rs. 100 only. By the Ordinance No. 40 of 1974, the aforesaid Sec. 23 was amended and the market fee was raised from Rs. 1.50 P. to Rs 2.25 P. ad valorem. This ordinance was later replaced by the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (Amendment) Act No. 13 of 1974 and was given retrospective effect from the date of the issue of the earlier Ordinance. The








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top