PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
R.S.Narula and Prem Chand Jain JJ.
Food Corporation Of India
Versus
State Of Punjab
Civil Writ No. 4066 of 1973,
Decided On : MAY 17, 1975
SALES TAX - Levy Order - Procurement of rice - Levy Order issued by State Government under Essential Commodities Act - Levy Order directed licensed millers and dealers to sell specified percentage of rice to State Government at controlled prices - Food Corporation of India (FCI) established under Food Corporations Act - FCI registered as dealer - FCI received rice from State Government under Levy Order and passed it on to deficit States - FCI filed writ petitions challenging assessment orders and demand notices issued by State Government for sales tax on procurement of rice - HELD, dismissing writ petitions: (i) Procurement of rice under Levy Order was not a taxable event as it was not a sale - (ii) Transaction between State Government and FCI was not a sale as FCI did not act as a dealer in the legal sense when it passed on the goods to other States - (iii) No profit-motive was involved in the transactions entered into between FCI and the deficit States.
Fact of the Case:
Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed writ petitions challenging assessment orders and demand notices issued by State Government for sales tax on procurement of rice under Levy Order issued by State Government under Essential Commodities Act.
Finding of the Court:
Procurement of rice under Levy Order was not a taxable event as it was not a sale - Transaction between State Government and FCI was not a sale as FCI did not act as a dealer in the legal sense when it passed on the goods to other States - No profit-motive was involved in the transactions entered into between FCI and the deficit States.
Issues: Whether the procurement of rice under the Levy Order was a taxable event - Whether the transaction between the State Government and the FCI was a sale - Whether the FCI acted as a dealer in the legal sense when it passed on the goods to other States - Whether there was any profit-motive involved in the transactions entered into between the FCI and the deficit States.
Ratio Decidendi: The procurement of rice under the Levy Order was not a taxable event as it was not a sale. The transaction between the State Government and the FCI was not a sale as the FCI did not act as a dealer in the legal sense when it passed on the goods to other States. There was no profit-motive involved in the transactions entered into between the FCI and the deficit States.
Final Decision: Writ petitions dismissed.
Prem Chand Jain, J.
1. This judgment and order of ours would dispose of Civil Writs Nos. 4065 and 4066 of 1973 and Civil Writ No. 5660 of 1974 as common question of law arises in all these petitions. In order to appreciate the contentions raised before us certain salient features from Civil Writ No. 4066 of 1973 may be noticed.
2. The Food Corporation of India and its Senior Regional Manager, Punjab, Chandigarh, have filed this petition under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the assessment orders (copy annexure F) and the demand notices and for a declaration that no sales tax is imposable on any of the transactions right from the stage of procurement of rice from the millers and the licensed dealers by the State Government or its officers up to the stage of delivery of the said procured rice to the depots of the corporation outside the State of Punjab. A further prayer has been made in the nature of the issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to recover any sales tax either under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 or the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, in pursuance of the assessment orders (annexure F) and demand notices issued thereunder.
3. The Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as the corporation) was established under the Food Corporations Act, 1964 (Act No. 37 of 1964) (hereinafter referred to as the Act). On 27th October, 1958, the Governor of the then State of Punjab with the prior concurrence of the Central Government issued an order known as the Punjab Rice Procurement Levy Order, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Levy Order).
4. It is stated in the petition that necessary funds for making the purchases under the Levy Order were made available by the corporation to the Director of Food and Supplies, State of Punjab, to the extent such funds were required for acquisition of rice to be delivered to the Central Pool, under the supervision and control of the corporation. The District Food and Supplies Controllers of the State of Punjab used to send to the Director of Food and Supplies, respondent No. 2 herein, daily accounts of purchase of rice made from the licensed dealers and licensed millers and the Director of Food and Supplies, respondent No. 2, in turn, transferred to the corporation the rice procured for and on behalf of the corporation along with the sale bills issued by the licensed millers and licensed dealers in his favour. No separate bill was sent either by respondent No. 1 or respondent No. 2 to the corporation in respect of the stocks of rice delivered or transferred to the corporation. The State Government through the agency of its Director of Food and Supplies, respondent No. 2, used to make the necessary adjustments against the funds made available to it by the corporation for the amount spent by them as price of the rice procured for and on behalf of the corporation and also for the establishment and other incidental expenses incurred for the said procurement. Besides, the procurement of rice under the provisions of the Levy Order, the corporation used to purchase rice directly from the State of Punjab and in all such cases, regular sale bills used to be made by the Director of Food and Supplies, respondent No. 2. The acceptance bill also used to be issued by the officers of the State of Punjab after rice was procured from the growers and the millers. In this manner the corporation purchased rice through the agency of the State Government, that is, respondent No. 2. After the rice was thus procured by the corporation through the agency of respondent No. 2, necessary adjustments towards the payment of price out of the advances made by the corporation used to be made and the unspent balance at the close of the procurement season used to be refunded to the corporation. Thus the rice was procured directly by the corporation through the agency of the State Government. The S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.