SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 1014

JASBIR SINGH
Hardayal Singh Rawat – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Housing Board – Respondent


Judgment

Jasbir Singh, J.

1 This order will dispose of four writ petitions, i.e., Civil Writ Petitions No. 2375, 3144, 3663 and 4656, all of the year 2008, in which challenge has been laid to Self-Financing Housing Scheme-2008 (in short 2008 Scheme) floated by Chandigarh Housing Board to allot flats on leasehold basis, for 99 years, to the employees of Chandigarh Administration. For facility of dictating judgment, facts are being taken from Civil Writ Petition No. 2375 of 2008.

2 It is case of the petitioner that he joined Haryana Civil Secretariat as a Clerk in the year 1973 and on superannuation, retired as Superintendent on February 28,2006. Before his retirement, petitioner was living in House No. 2207, Sector 27-C, Chandigarh, allotted to him by the Chandigarh Administration, in the year 1994, when he was working as an Assistant.

3 The petitioner has laid challenge to the 2008 Scheme on the ground that it is discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, because right to apply for a flat has been given only to the employees of Chandigarh Administration, its Boards, Corporation and employees of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and employees on deputati
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top