RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Rajiv Goel – Appellant
Versus
Sohan Lai Khosla – Respondent
1 This revision arises out of an order passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Patiala dated 10-8-2009, vide which an application filed under Order 1, Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, CPC) by the petitioner has been dismissed.
2 Brief facts of the case are that a suit for permanent injunction has been filed by the plaintiff-Sohan Lal Khosla against Munici pal Council, Sanaur, seeking to restrain it from interfering in his peaceful possession over the private passage measuring 200 square yards purchased by him vide sale deed dated 25-1-1999 and to take action in pursuance of notice dated 13-10-2005 issued by the defendants to remove obstruction from the private passage within seven days.
3 In the plaint, the plaintiff/respondent No. 1, has pleaded that he owned an ancestral house abutting Khola measuring 200 square yard owned by Krishan Murti son of Dharam Pal and Chaman Parkash Ex-President, M.C. Sanaur son of Jagan Nath and there was a private passage 3-6" in front of his house which goes up to that khola only and there was no other house in that street. He had purchased the said khola along with the private passage from the aforesaid persons vi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.