SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 426

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ALOK SINGH
Balaji Transport Co – Appellant
Versus
Ood Corporation Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Alok Singh, J.

1. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking writ of certiorari for quashing orders dated 29.5.2009 Annexure P-7, 15.6.2009 Annexure P-9, 22.10.2009 Annexure P-11 and 17.12.2009 Annexure P-13, whereby the petitioners firm was not considered for opening of the price bid after considering technical bid and thereafter rejected the petitioners representation.

2. Brief facts of the present case are that respondent No.1 invited tenders vide Annexure P-3 for appointment of a regular contractor for handling and transportation for a period of two years. The petitioner submitted his tender. However, the petitioner could not receive any information whether he was considered for technical bid or not, nor the petitioner received any information whether his tender was opened for price bid or not.

3. The petitioner received information of the contract finalizing in favour of respondent No.3 against tender notice Annexure P-3 vide order dated 15.6.2009. Thereafter, the petitioner came to know vide order dated 25.9.2009 that its technical bid was rejected by respondent No.3. Having received the aforesaid information, the petitioner filed CWP No.9969 of 2009, whic






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top