SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 356

S.S.SARON
Ved Parkash – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Saron, J.

1. Report (Annexure-P.6) of Medical Officer, Dhuri attached with the criminal miscellaneous applications is taken on record subject to just exceptions.

2. The criminal miscellaneous applications stand disposed of.

3. Medical reports (Annexures-P.7 to P.9) of Bhupinder Kumar, Vijay singla and Devinder Kumar attached with the criminal miscellaneous applications are taken on record subject to just exceptions. The criminal miscellaneous applications stand disposed of.

4. Devinder Kumar alias Binda-complainant (respondent No.2), bhupinder Kumar and Vijay Singla are present in Court and are identified by their counsel Mr. Ajay Singla, Advocate. It is stated by them that they have no objection to the quashing of the FIR (Annexure-P.1) as the matter has been compromised. It is also stated that they are making their statements of their own free will and without any kind of pressure or undue influence. Affidavits of Devinder Kumar (Annexure-P.4), Bhupinder Kumar (Annexure-P.5) and Vijay singla (Annexure-P.3), it is stated, have also been filed by them.

5. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.174 dated 26.10.2008 (Annexure-P.1) for the offences under Sections 307, 148











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top