SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 345

KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Sube Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J.

1. The office had reported on 23.7.2008 that appellant No.1 Sube singh has expired, therefore, present appeal qua him abate subject to an inquiry to be undertaken by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak. In case factum of death of Sube Singh is found to be true, no reference will made to this Court otherwise Registry will revive the appeal qua Sube Singh.

2. Sube Singh, Sumer Singh and Roop chand were named as accused in case FIR no.84 dated 07.09.1995 registered at Police Station Sahlawas,under Sections 332, 333, 353 IPC. FIR in the present case was registered on the basis of statement made by Jai Karan Singh. On 5th September, 1995 complainant was posted as Social Education Panchayat Officer, Sahlawas. Occurrence in the present case pertains to 5th September, 1995. On that day complainant had submitted his report regarding damage caused by floods to SDM, Jhajjar. Complainant reached near village Amadal, where tractor of Roop Chand was parked. It was about 8.30 PM. At that time complainant heard the voice of Roop chand stating that enemy has come, he should not be escaped. He was given lathi blows on the forehead and on the right hand. Compla







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top