VINOD K.SHARMA
Mohinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Pritpal Singh – Respondent
VINOD K.SHARMA, J.
1. Cm No.25170-CII of 2008 allowed. The applicant-petitioner is exempted from filing the certified copies of Annexures P/1 to P/5 and Annexures P/1 to P/4 are taken on record. CR No.6841 of 2008
2. This revision petition is directed against the order, passed by the learned Courts below, on an application moved by the petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil, seeking injunction against, the alienation of the property during the pendency of the suit.
3. The plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell, which is contested by the respondents. Along with the suit, the plaintiff/petitioner also moved an application under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking injunction against alienation of the suit property during the pendency of the suit.
4. The learned trial Court rejected the application for injunction.
5. The appeal also stands dismissed. The order passed by the learned lower appellate Court reads as under: -
"10. Here after careful scanning of the impugned order and the record it is found that there is no illegality or irregularity in the order which might have called for inter
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.