SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 213

VINOD K.SHARMA
Mohinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Pritpal Singh – Respondent


Judgment

VINOD K.SHARMA, J.

1. Cm No.25170-CII of 2008 allowed. The applicant-petitioner is exempted from filing the certified copies of Annexures P/1 to P/5 and Annexures P/1 to P/4 are taken on record. CR No.6841 of 2008

2. This revision petition is directed against the order, passed by the learned Courts below, on an application moved by the petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil, seeking injunction against, the alienation of the property during the pendency of the suit.

3. The plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell, which is contested by the respondents. Along with the suit, the plaintiff/petitioner also moved an application under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking injunction against alienation of the suit property during the pendency of the suit.

4. The learned trial Court rejected the application for injunction.

5. The appeal also stands dismissed. The order passed by the learned lower appellate Court reads as under: -

"10. Here after careful scanning of the impugned order and the record it is found that there is no illegality or irregularity in the order which might have called for inter



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top