Sham Sunder, J.

1. This appeal, is directed, against the judgement and decree, dated 18.07.07, rendered by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rohtak, vide which, it dismissed the suit of the plaintiffs, and, the judgement and decree, dated 17.01.08, rendered by the Additional District Judge (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, Rohtak, vide which, it dismissed the appeal.

2. The facts, in brief, are that, the plaintiffs, were in possession of H. No. 556/29, situated at Tilak Nagar, Rohtak,having boundaries and dimensions of 440 sq. yards. The house, in question, was purchased, from one Angrej Singh son of Hari Narain, for a sale consideration of Rs. 1,10,000/-, vide registered sale deed. It was stated that the plaintiffs, received a notice, issued by defendant No. 1, stating therein, that plaintiff No. 1, had stood guarantor for defendant No. 2, against the loan advanced, by it (defendant No. 1), and had deposited the original sale deed, in respect thereof, as collateral security. It was further stated that the house, in question, was jointly owned by the plaintiffs. It was further stated that, however, the notice had been issued, only to plaintiff No. 1, stating therein, tha