SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 2047

PERMOD KOHLI
Jai Krishan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

1. Shri Dharmpal in FIR No. 140 dated 28.11.2005 for offence under Sections 302/307 read with Section 34 of the IPC and Sections 25/27/24/54/59 of the Indian Arms Act. The accused who is respondent No. 2 in this petition was one of the accused in the aforesaid FIR and was facing the trial. He filed bail application being Crl. Misc. No. 75824-M of 2006 which came to be dismissed as withdrawn on 4.12.2006. The said accused filed the second bail application being Crl. Misc. No. 3746-M of 2008 before this Court. The bail was sought primarily on medical grounds. The accused pleaded that he is suffering from serious ailment and further custody of the accused would not be conducive to his health. This Court called a report from the Jail. One Dr. Karamjit Singh posted as Senior Medical Officer, Incharge Central Jail, Patiala submitted his report dated 5.10.2007 to the Superintendent, Incharge Central Jail, Patiala giving details of the treatments given to the accused from time to time. The said doctor also appeared in the Court alongwith the report. During the course of hearing, the doctor informed the court that the accused is suffering from heart ailment on account of old injury
























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top