SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 2050

PERMOD KOHLI
Karamjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Permod Kohli, J.

1. The petitioner is a doctor posted in Central Jail, Patiala. He was questioned the legality and validity of suspension order dated 5.5.2008 (Annexure P-23) placing him under suspension allegedly pursuant to a communication of respondent No. 3, a Law Officer working as Senior Deputy Advocate General. Punjab in the officer of Advocate General, Punjab. He has also assailed the opinion of the Board of Doctors of the PGIMER, Chandigarh dated 15.3.2008 in respect of one Narinder Kumar son of Dharam Kumar, an accused lodged in the Central Jail as an under trial for commission of offences under Sections 302/307 read with Section 34 IPC. While alleging motives to respondent No. 3, a Law officer has placed on record copies of certain communications addressed by respondent No. 3 to functionaries of the State in his professional capacity as he was engaged to represent the State in a case Crl. Mis. No. 3746 of 2008 filed by Jai Kishan for cancellation of bail of the petitioner-Doctor. Copies to these communications from respondent No. 3 to S.K. Asthana, SSP, Patiala, Mohammad Izhar Alam. IPS, Additional Director General of Police, Punjab, Chandigarh are Annexures P-19
























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top