SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 1921

M.M.S.BEDI
Babu Singh – Appellant
Versus
Shamsher Singh – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.S.Bedi, J.

1. Suit of the plaintiff-appellant for recovery of a sum of Rs. 24970/- was decreed. The defendant-respondents was burdened with future interest on decretal amount at the rate of 1% per month from the date of institution of suit till realization. Suit of the plaintiff-appellant was decreed against defendant No. 1 Gill International Travel Service and defendant No. 2 Shamsher Singh. Defendant No. 2 Shamsher Singh preferred an appeal against the decree for recovery of money against the plaintiff- respondents and his co-defendant No. 1. The lower Appellate Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the order of the trial Court for recovery of Rs. 24970/- but reversed the judgment of the trial Court allowing future interest at the rate of 12% per annum and taking into consideration the provisions of Section 34 CPC reduced the interest on the decretal amount to 6% per annum. The appeal, however, was dismissed. The plaintiff being dissatisfied with the order passed by the lower Appellate Court reducing the rate of interest preferred the appeal on the ground that reduction of rate of interest from 12% per annum awarded by the trial Court to 6% per annum is wrong, warra







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top