SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 1847

RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Kumar And Others – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.

1. CM No. 5215-CII of 2009 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO No. 1117 of 2009

2. This is claimants appeal for enhancement of compensation by modifying the award dated 20.12.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rewari.

3. As per the averments made in this case, on 15.3.2006 one Vikrant along with Raj Kumar, Smt. Suman, Golu and Gagan Kumar were going to village Milkhpur, Rajasthan, from Rewari in Car No. HR36-B/2386 which was being driven by Raj Kumar at a normal speed on the correct side of the road. When the car was 1 kilometer ahead of village Hansaka on Rewari-Dharuhera road, Gypsy No. HR-26/D-7105 being driven in a rash and negligent manner at a high speed came from front side and hit the car. Resultantly, all the occupants of the car sustained injuries. Vikrant sustained fatal injuries and died at the spot. Smt. Suman wife of Raj Kumar who had sustained fatal injuries succumbed in Safdarjang Hospital, Delhi, while the claimants Golu, Rajkumar and Gagan sustained injuries. FIR No. 18 dated 15.3.2006 under Sections 279, 337, 304-A IPC, Police Station Sadar Rewari was registered in this regard. Mahavir and Monik


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top