SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 1823

RAKESH KUMAR GARG
New India Assurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Umesh Kumari And Others – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.

1. This is insurers appeal challenging the impugned award dated 25.7.2008 whereby compensation has been granted to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 on account of death of Pawan Kumar in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 21.9.2005. The offending vehicle was duly insured with the appellant.

2. The grievance of the appellant before this court is that no liability could be fastened upon the appellant as deceased Pawan Kumar was not a third party and therefore, the claim petition which was filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the appellant was not maintainable. According to the counsel for the appellant, Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 lays down that the owner of the motor vehicle or the authorized insurer shall be liable to pay compensation in case of death or permanent disability due to accident arising out of the use of motor vehicle as indicated in the second schedule to the legal heirs or the victims as the case made. Since there was no tort feaser, therefore, the appellant was not liable to pay any compensation. In support of his argument, learned counsel for the appellant has placed upon reliance in the case










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top