SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1500

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Mehtab S.Gill and A.N.Jindal JJ.
Lakhwinder Singh
Versus
State Of Punjab
Criminal Appeal No. 607 of 2005,
Decided On : AUGUST 20, 2007

IMPORTANT POINT
Contraband--The sample of the case property was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory after seven days. This itself shows, that the tampering must have taken place.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15-Contraband-Appeal against conviction-Acquittal-Recovery of 35 bags, each containing 19.5 Kg. of poppy husk-Appellants were apprehended while sitting on gunny bags containing poppy husk-There are glaring discrepancies in the prosecution case-DSP who was called at the time of search was not brought into the witness box and was given up as being unnecessary by the prosecution-DSP did not put the impression of his own seal either on the case property or the samples-The sample of the case property was sent to the FSL after 7 days-In the intervening period tempering of the case property could have been easily done-Number of private jeep in which the police officials were travelling has not been given-Constable who has brought the weights and scales was not produced-Conviction of sentence set aside. (Para 11 & 12)

       (B) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15-Contraband--The sample of the case property was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory after seven days. This itself shows, that the tampering must have taken place. (Para 8)

       

Judgment

Mehtab S.Gill, J.

1. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 7.7.2005 of the Special Court, Patiala, whereby the learned Judge convicted Lakhwinder Singh son of Mann Singh and Balwinder Kaur wife of late Amrik Singh under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called as "NDPS Act"). They were sentenced to twelve years R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. one lac each. In default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for two years.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 23.4.2002 SI Tejinder Singh, SHO Police Station Ghagga sent ruqa Ex.PM to Police Station Ghagga, stating that he along with SI Ajaib Singh, ASI Surinderpaljit Singh, Constable Labh Singh, Constable Faqir Chand, Constable Kulwant Singh, Constable Balwant Singh, Constable Jagtar Singh and Constable Baljinder Singh were present at Village Shahpur on a private vehicle in connection with the checking of religious places at the temple of Shahpur, which is named as Shahpur Tilla. When they stopped to check the temple of Shahpur Tilla, the police party saw a man and a woman sitting on plastic bags. On seeing that the police party was watching them, they took shelter behind the arranged bags. On seeing them behaving in a suspicious manner, SI Tejinder Singh asked them as to who they were. The man gave his name as Lakhwinder Singh alias Lakha son of Mann Singh and the woman gave her name as Balwinder Kaur wd/o Amrik Singh. SI Tejinder Singh told them, that he had suspicion that there was contraband in the bags and he wanted to conduct a search. He offered them, as to whether they wanted to be searched by a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. They refused to be searched by SI Tejinder Singh. He sent a wireless message to Police Station Samana to send a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. A lady constable was also called at the spot. Sh. J.P.S.Sidhu, DSP Samana reached the spot. Both the accused gave their consent to be searched by the DSP. Consent memo was prepared. Lamberdar Gurnam Singh of Village Kakrala was joined in the investigation. Lady Constable Harjit Kaur also reached at the spot. On search, poppy husk was found in all the 35 bags. 250-250 gms of poppy husk was taken out twice as samples from 2 each bag. 70 sample parcels were prepared. The bulk of poppy husk in the rest of 35 bags was weighed, which came out to be 19.5 Kgs each. Each bag was marked with Sr. No. 1 to 35. Sample bags were sealed and the main bulk was also sealed with the sample seal of "TS". After using the sample seal, it was handed over to Lamberdar Gurnam Singh. The sample seal was attested by the DSP Samana. On the basis of this ruqa, FIR Ex.PM/1 was recorded.

3. The prosecution to prove its case brought into the witness box HC Swatantarpal Singh PW1, HC Satnam Singh PW2, ASI Surinderpaljit Singh PW3 and SI Tejinder Singh PW4.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant has argued, that the police officials were travelling in a private jeep. Number of the jeep is not mentioned anywhere, nor the driver of the jeep was brought into the witness box. No explanation has also come forth as to why the driver was not made a witness.

5. J.P.S. Sidhu, DSP Samana did not fix his seal. He was cited as a witness, but was given up as being unnecessary. This is fatal flaw in the case of the prosecution. DSP Samana J.P.S.Sidhu was the Gazetted Officer, who was called to the spot.

6. Constable Faqir Chand, who had allegedly brought the weights and scales, was not brought into the witness box, nor was his affidavit filed.

7. ASI Surinderpaljit Singh PW3 has stated, that the seal was handed over to a private person, but that private person has not been named. The Investigating Officer SI Tejinder Singh PW4 has stated, that 3 the seal was given to SI Ajaib Singh. Lamberdar Gurnam Singh of Village Kakrala, who was joined by the Investigating Officer, was not brought into the witness box. Actually, the seal was handed over to Gurnam Singh Lamberdar.

8. The sample of





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top