Permod Kohli, J.

1. This Revision Petition under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act is filed against the judgment dated 9.5.2007 passed by the Additional District Judge, Patiala whereby judgment dated 16.3.2006 passed by the Rent Controller, Patiala has been affirmed.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case as emerge from the record are that the respondent herein filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act before the Rent Collector, Patiala, for eviction of the petitioners herein from the shop in question. The eviction of the petitioners was sought on two counts firstly on account of non-payment of rent and secondly on account of personal necessity of the landlady for the use of her son. The Rent Controller, on the basis of the evidence of the parties, came to the conclusion that the shop in question is needed by landlady for settling her son to the business of the photography. It also returned a specific finding that the present petitioners/tenants have an alternative business. The Appellate Court also concurred with the findings and affirmed the judgment or the trial Court vide its judgment dated 9.5.2007 which