VINOD K.SHARMA
Raj Kumar Vij – Appellant
Versus
Hem Raj Singla – Respondent
Vinod K.Sharma, J.
1. C.M. No. 3412-CII of 2007 For the reasons stated in the application, the order dated 14.2.2007 is recalled and the case is restored to its original number. C.M. stands allowed. C.R. No. 6748 of 2001 The present revision petition has been filed against the order of eviction passed by the learned Rent Controller and affirmed by the learned appellate authority.
2. The landlord respondent had filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act) for eviction of the petitioner from the premises situated at Sirhind Mandi, Tehsil and District Fatehgarh Sahib. The case set up by the respondent- landlord was that petitioner was tenant in a portion of the house on a monthly rent of Rs. 100/- (Rs. one hundred only) and the tenant was in arrears of rent. It was also claimed that the petitioner tenant had made material alterations in the tenanted premises. A ground of personal necessity was also taken. The application was contested and on the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed :-
1. Whether the tender made by the respondent on the first date of hearing is not valid ? OPA
1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.