SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1339

UMA NATH SINGH, A.N.JINDAL
Parminder Mohan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

A.N.JINDAL, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of four appeals i.e. CRA Nos. 234-DB, 247-B, 255-DB of 2005 and CRA No. 171-DB of 2007. All the appeals having arisen out of the same judgment (i.e. judgment dated 21-2-2005) passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula, vide which, four accused-appellants (hereinafter referred to as the appellants) namely, Lovepreet Kaur, Parminder Mohan, Manjit Singh alias Mithu and Lohit Kaushal were convicted under Section 364-A, 342 read with Section 120-B, IPC and accused Manjit Singh alias Mithu was also convicted under Section 411, IPC and they were sentenced as under :-

u/S. 364-A read with Section 120-B, IPC All the four appellants were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- each, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year;

U/S. 342 read with Section 120-B, IPC All the four to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- each, in default of payment of fine, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for 3 months;

U/S. 411 Accused Manjit Singh alias Mithu to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/-, in defult













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top