SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 2390

AMAR DUTT, A.N.JINDAL
Ved Parkash – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

A.N.Jindal, J.

1. Appellants Ved Parkash @ Bhagwan Dia son of Puran Singh and Rajesh © Raju son of Sukh Ram both residents of Village Jandli, District Ambala have been charged under Sections 302/34, IPC for abducting and killing Nirmal Singh on the intervening night of 21/22.8.1995. After trial, they were convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000.00 each, and in default of payment of fine they were to further undergo RI for six months each by Sessions Judge, Ambala. Since both the accused filed different appeals in this Court, namely, Crl. Appeal Nos. 432-DB and 448-DB of 1997 and the complainant has also filed a Crl. Rev. No. 624 of 1997 for enhancement of sentence of fine. Therefore, all the three matters are being disposed of by way of a common Judgment.

2. The genesis of the case began with the report which was lodged by Gurdial Singh uncle of the deceased Nirmal Singh on hearsay basis i.e. after receiving information from PW-6 Sharda Devi about the incident.

3. He in his statement, Ex. PE/1, dated 22.8.1995 at 9.00 A.M. recorded that on 21.8.1995 at about 9.30 P.M. Ved parkash @ Bhagwan Dia accused-appellant (hereinafter referred to















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top