SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 646

G.S.SINGHVI, NIRMAL SINGH
Bhoruka Power Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.SINGHVI, J.

1. hether allocation made in favour of the petitioner by the Haryana State Energy Development Agency (HAREDA) for development of small Hydro Power Projects on canal drops of Dadupur Western Yamuna Canal (Lower) on Build, Operate and Own basis could be cancelled without giving opportunity of hearing and whether the said site could be allocated to Haryana Power Generation Company Ltd. (respondent No. 3) even though it was not entitled to submit proposal in terms of the advertisement issued by HAREDA are the questions which arise for determination in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The background

2. For the purpose of seeking financial assistance from the World Bank to support its efforts to reform and develop the power sector, the Government of Haryana took the following steps :(i) In the year 1997, the State Government introduced the Haryana State Electricity Reform Bill which was passed by the Legislature on 22-7-1997 leading to the bifurcation of the Haryana State Electricity Board into four Corporations, two of which were to exclusively deal with the generation and transmission of the electricity.(ii) In May, 1997, HAREDA







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top