SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 446

R.L.ANAND
Dharma Pal – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev And Ors. – Respondent


Judgment

R.L.Anand, J.

1. Dharam Pal claims that he was born to Smt. Chalti Devi and has filed the present appeal which has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 18.8.1999 passed by the Court of learned District Judge, Sonepat who accepted the appeal of the plaintiffs- respondents Sanjeev and others by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 20.2.1999 passed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sonepat, who dismissed the suit of the plaintiff (now respondents).

2. Some facts can be noticed in the following manner:

Sanjeev and others filed a suit for declaration that they are the owners of the land in question by efflux of time and the case set by the plaintiffs was that Dharampal defendant mortgaged land measuring 3 Bighas 15 Biswas including all rights appurtenant thereto in favour of Smt. Brahrni Devi on 13.11.1961/18.11.1961 for a consideration of Rs. 20,000/- and it was agreed upon that if Dharampal fails to get the land redeemed within 6 months, then Brahtni Devi shall have the right to get the sale deed executed in her favour. Brahmi Devi died but during her life time she executed will. On that basis, all the right of her property were gi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top