SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 622

V.K.JHANJI
Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sarla – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Jhanji, J.

1. The husband (appellant herein) filed petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short the Act) against wife seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion. It was claimed in the petition that the marriage between the parties took place on 21.6.1963. Parties to the marriage have been living separately since July, 1986 and the present application for dissolution of marriage was filed on 19.8.1988.

2. During the pendency of the petition before the Additional District Judge, Gurgaon, a compromise was arrived at between the parties which was reduced into writing and in the said compromise the parties decided to seek divorce my mutual consent. The said compromise was placed on record as Ex. P.1. In the compromise, a sum of Rs. 21,000/- was paid to the wife in full and final settlement of her claim. She also undertook not to claim any maintenance or any amount, towards dowry, permanent alimony etc. etc. It appears that this compromise was not pressed during the pendency of the petition. The learned Additional District Judge, Gurgaon, dismissed the petition. The husband has impugned the decree dismissing his petition under Section 13 of the A




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top