SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1172

S.S.SARON
Chander Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Saron, J.

1. The petitioner Chander Pal Singh seeks pre-arrest bail in terms of Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No. 207 dated 5.11.2006 for the offences under Sections 363, 366A, 341, 506 and 120-B IPC registered against him at Police Station City, Kotkapura.

2. The FIR has been registered on the complaint of Raj Kumar. It is alleged that his daughter Shelly, who was studying in 10+2, had suddenly on 10.10.2006 at about 6.00 p.m. left the house. Despite search she could not be traced. On the following day i.e. 11.10.2006 at about 11.00 a.m. the complainant received a call on his mobile. The calling party informed the complainant that his daughter has been taken away by the petitioner on the pretext of marrying her. Thereafter, his daughter made a call at about 6.15 p.m. and told the complainant that she had been taken by the petitioner on the saying of his sister Gaytri Devi and the husband of Gaytri Devi, namely, Narinder Kumar. She has been confined under threat by them and also one Chameli Devi wife of Ram Phool Singh. On the basis of the above, the FIR has been registered for the afore-noticed offences.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in fac







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top