SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1012

ARVIND KUMAR
Durga Furniture And Body Builders Production Coop. Industrial Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Coop. Societies – Respondent


Judgment

Arvind Kumar, J.

1. Since a common question of law and facts is involved in all these petitions, they are being disposed of by this judgment passed in C.W.P. No. 4997 of 1986.

2. The facts of all the petitions are similar except the change in the names of petitioner firms.

3. Respondent No. 2 is an Apex institution in the State of Haryana for supply of items, on demand, to various office of the State Government, while the petitioners are its primary members, which are catering to the demands of various Government offices made through respondent No. 2. On the basis of an enquiry conducted by Vigilance Department and Cooperative Department, an order dated 3.7.1986 was passed by respondent No. 1 by dint of which he directed to black-list all the Societies, which included the petitioner Societies, on the ground that they have exorbitantly charged the rates of the material supplied to the PWD B&R, Haryana during the period 1.4.1982 to 31.10.1984. Following the afore-stated decision taken by respondent No. 1, respondent No. 2 passed orders dated 16.7.1986 separately and thereby black-listed the petitioner Societies and stopped all the transactions with them, which action of respo





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top